The 9/11 Phone Calls
08/07/2013 21:24
The 9/11 Phone Calls: Disturbing Irregularities Uncovered in the Calls that Flashed around the World
Now, in addition to the WSJ noting that the whole scenario of jet fuel burning concrete-and-steel-reinforced load bearing columns in the center of the World Trade Center and a “pancake” model of near-free-fall collapse – a feat that defies any ordinary physics I ever learned – is now even being mentioned in the prestigious newspaper, there are these rather interesting summations of the “phone call problem”:
” The 9/11 Consensus Panel now offers four evidence-based Points about the alleged phone calls from the 9/11 flights.
“The famous “let’s roll” drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer’s 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephone supervisor Lisa Jefferson, who reported Beamer as strangely tranquil, declining to speak to his wife. Eerily, Beamer’s line remained open for 15 minutes after the crash.
“Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer’s cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.
“Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
“Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
“During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) “unconnected” call from Barbara Olson, lasting “0 seconds.”
“In another twist, two other women reported that Caller-ID showed their husband’s cell numbers on their answering machines, which while lasting several minutes, had been made from elevations of 25,000 and 35,000 feet.”
Phone calls from people that were, according to the official scenario, already dead? For the WSJ to mention things of this sort is to point out the obvious: serious problems in the official scenario are now being noticed by serious people.
Which raises as many questions as it answers, the most important of which is: why now? The above noted discrepancies have been circulating among various researchers of the whole 9/11 official scenario - with its “Warren Commission” version, with its magic airplane fuel that can magically remove the load bearing columns of two steel-and-concrete cantilevered buildings, and “dustify” over 500,000 tons of building, each - for many years. Why now? The phone call discrepancies were some of the earliest anomalies reported. So, again, why now?
I suspect the reason lies in the fact that there is some “deep linkage” or “dot connecting” being done now by most people, with the IRS-NSA revelations, many are drawing the conclusion that there is some rogue element in the US government. Eisenhower warned us of it, even Nikita Khrushchev warned us of it.
Suppose, for example, all that spying (woops, “data mining”) began before 9/11? Wouldn’t it be interesting to know what the “phone records” would then show. But what they show now is serious enough: there are manifold and serious problems with the bill-of-goods the Bush administration sold to the American people and to the world. Finally, someone in the “mainstream” is beginning to notice. Now….watch for the “documentaries” to appear, subtly favoring the “official scenario”.
Add magic airplane fuel to magic bullets. While you’re adding those two things, never forget that domestic state sponsored terrorism has been a part of the oligarchical playbook since…oh…well…since the Venetian “republic.” Can you say gladio?
NEW YORK, May 16, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- America first learned of the 9/11 hijackings from Solicitor-General Ted Olson, who reported two calls from his wife, well-known CNN commentator Barbara Olson.
From American Airlines Flight 77, Barbara Olson fleshed out the drama of diminutive Muslim hijackers using knives and box-cutters to herd dozens of passengers to the rear of the plane.
These and other reported calls have now been examined by the 9/11 Consensus Panel of scientists, pilots, professors, attorneys, and journalists.
The Panel began its research in 2011 with the Twin Towers and the sudden, stunning collapse of adjacent Building WTC7, a massive 47-storey steel-framed skyscraper.
The official conclusion that all 82 support columns failed simultaneously from fire alone has for years raised serious questions about the official account.
The 9/11 Consensus Panel now offers four evidence-based Points about the alleged phone calls from the 9/11 flights.
The famous "let's roll" drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer's 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephone supervisor Lisa Jefferson, who reported Beamer as strangely tranquil, declining to speak to his wife. Eerily, Beamer's line remained open for 15 minutes after the crash.
Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer's cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.
Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."
In another twist, two other women reported that Caller-ID showed their husband's cell numbers on their answering machines, which while lasting several minutes, had been made from elevations of 25,000 and 35,000 feet.
Finally, although the FBI conducted a massive investigation into the calls, none of the telephone billing, nor any of the cell phone location data stored in standard phone company records has been publicly released.
